Search Religion News

Show summaries



Religion News
Israeli News

Top News Stories
U.S. Political News
Canadian News

Christian Magazines
Link To Us

Bible Resources
• Bible Study Aids
• Bible Devotionals
• Audio Sermons
Community
• ChristiansUnite Blogs
• Christian Forums
Web Search
• Christian Family Sites
• Top Christian Sites
Family Life
• Christian Finance
• ChristiansUnite KIDS
Read
• Christian News
• Christian Columns
• Christian Song Lyrics
• Christian Mailing Lists
Connect
• Christian Singles
• Christian Classifieds
Graphics
• Free Christian Clipart
• Christian Wallpaper
Fun Stuff
• Clean Christian Jokes
• Bible Trivia Quiz
• Online Video Games
• Bible Crosswords
Webmasters
• Christian Guestbooks
• Banner Exchange
• Dynamic Content
Subscribe to our Free Newsletter.
Enter your email address:

Religion News
 You're here » News Main Index » Religion News
Religion News
Printer friendly version
Email page to a friend
Link to this story

Vermont Man Persists, Wants Scripture Reference on Vanity Plate

by Allie Martin
May 19, 2005
Like This Page?

(AgapePress) - A Vermont man continues to fight the state over its refusal to allow him to place a Bible verse on his license plate.

In April 2004, Rutland, Vermont, resident Shawn Byrne submitted an application for a vanity plate inscribed with "John316." Alternatives he found acceptable were "JN316" and "JN36TN." By his own admission on the application, Byrne explained that his requests referred to Bible passages.

Officials denied his application, claiming the message he requested "refers to deity," and that since license plates are state property any religious message on them could be viewed as government endorsement of religion. With assistance from the Alliance Defense Fund, Byrne sued the state.

ADF attorney Jeremy Tedesco says the rejection of the plates is a violation of Byrne's constitutional rights.

"Lots of states view license plates as state property, and in actuality they are. [Consequently] many states have laws on their books prohibiting offensive language or prohibiting certain categories of language," the attorney acknowledges. "But the reality is, we all know when we drive around the streets and we see these vanity plates that the message that appears on them is not a message chosen by the state, but [one] chosen by the person behind the wheel."

Under Vermont law, the Department of Motor Vehicles is allowed to reject a word or phrase considered offensive or confusing to the general public. More specifically, the regulations state that license plates are not to be allowed to have a combination of letters or numbers that refer to any language to race, religion, color, deity, ethnic heritage, gender, sexual orientation, disability status, or political affiliation.

Tedesco says those regulations are "quite incredible, constitutionally preposterous."

"[They] say that no offensive language can be on license plates; then they define 'offensive' as things like obscenity and pornography and profanity," he explains. "Incredibly, [they] throw religious speech into that category of offensiveness as well -- and that's simply unconstitutional."

Attorneys for the state have asked a federal court to dismiss the lawsuit. But Tedesco has asked for a preliminary injunction in the case that would allow Byrne to get the plates. A ruling is expected later this summer.


Allie Martin, a regular contributor to AgapePress, is a reporter for American Family Radio News, which can be heard online.

Discuss this article in the ChristiansUnite Discussion Forums

Back to Religion News Headlines.




More From ChristiansUnite...    About Us | Privacy Policy | | ChristiansUnite.com Site Map | Statement of Beliefs



Copyright © 1999-2025 ChristiansUnite.com. All rights reserved.
Please send your questions, comments, or bug reports to the

NOTE: News and information presented on this web site is for informational purposes only. ChristiansUnite.com does not necessarily endorse the views and opinions expressed.