Search Religion News

Show summaries



Religion News
Israeli News

Top News Stories
U.S. Political News
Canadian News

Christian Magazines
Link To Us

Bible Resources
• Bible Study Aids
• Bible Devotionals
• Audio Sermons
Community
• ChristiansUnite Blogs
• Christian Forums
Web Search
• Christian Family Sites
• Top Christian Sites
Family Life
• Christian Finance
• ChristiansUnite KIDS
Read
• Christian News
• Christian Columns
• Christian Song Lyrics
• Christian Mailing Lists
Connect
• Christian Singles
• Christian Classifieds
Graphics
• Free Christian Clipart
• Christian Wallpaper
Fun Stuff
• Clean Christian Jokes
• Bible Trivia Quiz
• Online Video Games
• Bible Crosswords
Webmasters
• Christian Guestbooks
• Banner Exchange
• Dynamic Content
Subscribe to our Free Newsletter.
Enter your email address:

Religion News
 You're here » News Main Index » Religion News
Religion News
Printer friendly version
Email page to a friend
Link to this story

Amendment to Add New Border Patrol Agents Defeated in U.S. Senate

by James L. Lambert
July 22, 2005
Like This Page?

(AgapePress) - U.S. Senator John Ensign of Nevada offered Senate Amendment #1124 late last week, that effectively would have added 1,000 new Border Patrol agents to improve border security. But the measure went down to defeat.

In offering the amendment, the Republican lawmaker said that "keeping our borders secure is the first line of defense in preventing acts of terrorism." The three-line amendment, which was intended to be added to the appropriations for the Department of Homeland Security, read as follows: "... of which $367,552,000 shall be transferred to Customs and Border Protection for hiring 1,000 border agents and for other necessary support activities for such agency ...." The amendment initiative was defeated 38-60 in a vote taken Thursday (July 21).

Senator Brownback (R-Kansas), a co-sponsor of the amendment, issued a statement of the defeat on Friday. "It is unfortunate that the Senate did not agree to [this] amendment. Protecting our borders is critical .... [This would] have provided a larger border security for greater land coverage .... I will continue to work diligently in the future to ensure that our borders are secure." Other co-sponsors of the amendment included Senators Tom Coburn, John McCain, Lindsey Graham, and Jon Kyle.

CNN correspondent Lou Dobbs believes the vote on the amendment offers the public simple insight to the Senate's lack of resolve in providing additional Border Patrol agents. Dobbs characterized the vote as "a sharp and disappointing example of Congress's failure to address a critically important gap in our defenses against radical Islamic terrorists."

With the exception of Senators Ken Salazar (Colorado) and Barbara Mikulski (Maryland), all Democratic senators voted against the request for funding for new Border Patrol agents. They were joined by 12 Republican senators who did not vote for the amendment: Christopher Bond (Missouri), Lincoln Chafee (Rhode Island), Norm Coleman (Minnesota), Susan Collins (Maine), Jim DeMint (South Carolina), James Inhofe (Oklahoma), Richard Lugar (Indiana), Rick Santorum (Pennsylvania), Gordon Smith (Oregon), Olympia Snowe (Maine), Arlen Spector (Pennsylvania), and James Talent (Missouri). One senator, Trent Lott of Mississippi, did not vote on the measure.


James L. Lambert, a frequent contributor to AgapePress, is the author of Porn in America (Huntington House), which can be purchased through the American Family Association. He is a licensed real-estate mortgage loan sales agent and can be contacted through his website.

Discuss this article in the ChristiansUnite Discussion Forums

Back to Religion News Headlines.




More From ChristiansUnite...    About Us | Privacy Policy | | ChristiansUnite.com Site Map | Statement of Beliefs



Copyright © 1999-2025 ChristiansUnite.com. All rights reserved.
Please send your questions, comments, or bug reports to the

NOTE: News and information presented on this web site is for informational purposes only. ChristiansUnite.com does not necessarily endorse the views and opinions expressed.