Search Religion News

Show summaries



Religion News
Israeli News

Top News Stories
U.S. Political News
Canadian News

Christian Magazines
Link To Us

Bible Resources
• Bible Study Aids
• Bible Devotionals
• Audio Sermons
Community
• ChristiansUnite Blogs
• Christian Forums
Web Search
• Christian Family Sites
• Top Christian Sites
Family Life
• Christian Finance
• ChristiansUnite KIDS
Read
• Christian News
• Christian Columns
• Christian Song Lyrics
• Christian Mailing Lists
Connect
• Christian Singles
• Christian Classifieds
Graphics
• Free Christian Clipart
• Christian Wallpaper
Fun Stuff
• Clean Christian Jokes
• Bible Trivia Quiz
• Online Video Games
• Bible Crosswords
Webmasters
• Christian Guestbooks
• Banner Exchange
• Dynamic Content
Subscribe to our Free Newsletter.
Enter your email address:

Religion News
 You're here » News Main Index » Religion News
Religion News
Printer friendly version
Email page to a friend
Link to this story

Florida Amendment Would Hold Activist Courts in Check

by Jim Brown and Jody Brown
March 23, 2006
Like This Page?

(AgapePress) - - In an attempt to resurrect their state's school voucher program, Florida lawmakers are considering a proposed constitutional amendment that would limit when the state's courts can declare a law unconstitutional.

The bill introduced by Representative David Simmons was drafted in response to a January decision the Florida Supreme Court that struck down Governor Jeb Bush's school voucher law. The court ruled vouchers violate a clause in the Florida Constitution that guarantees a "uniform ... system of free public schools that allows students to obtain a high-quality education."

The ruling directly affected the governor's Opportunity Scholarship Program, which allows children in failing public schools to attend another public or private school at taxpayers' expense; and perhaps other Florida options like the McKay and Corporate Tax Credit Scholarship Programs.

The proposed amendment would say the legislature could not be blocked from passing a law unless it is expressly prohibited in the state Constitution. State Representative Dennis Baxley of Ocala says the bill ensures the state does not become a oligarchy -- rule by a few.

"We believe that this [amendment] does empower the people, and it does ... clarify that the interpretation of the Constitution is to respect the people's right to come up with solutions that are not specifically spelled [out] in the Constitution," says the chairman of the House Education Council. "That's why we have the legislative branch."

According to Baxley, the measure goes beyond empowering the people; he says it also sends an important message to the activist Florida Supreme Court.

"We want to clarify to the court in this amendment, if the people vote for it, that they're to respect the legislative authority of the people -- through their representatives -- to interpret the Constitution in a more constricted or concise manner, more literal manner."

The measure would need approval from a three-fifths majority in each state chamber to appear on the November 2006 ballot. Baxley stated earlier that the key to getting the bill through the legislature is hanging on to key Republican votes that he describes as "marginal when it comes to a discussion of scholarship issues." If passed, the amendment would not immediately make the state voucher program legal.

No Logic in Court's Ruling
The Opportunity Scholarship Program, which currently serves slightly more than 700 students in Florida, is the smallest of the three voucher programs in the state. Syndicated columnist George Will argues that the Florida Supreme Court's ruling was itself unconstitutional -- and blasts the court for "fulfill[ing] the desires of the teachers unions."

Referring to the clause found in the state Constitution, Will says the court "argued that the word 'uniform' means that the state must utilize only public schools in providing 'high-quality education.'" That, says the columnist, "even though many public schools are providing nothing of the sort."

Such an argument defies logic, he says. "The court's ruling was a crashing non sequitur: that the public duty to provide something (quality education) entails a prohibition against providing it in a particular way (utilizing successful private educational institutions)," he writes.

Discuss this article in the ChristiansUnite Discussion Forums

Back to Religion News Headlines.




More From ChristiansUnite...    About Us | Privacy Policy | | ChristiansUnite.com Site Map | Statement of Beliefs



Copyright © 1999-2025 ChristiansUnite.com. All rights reserved.
Please send your questions, comments, or bug reports to the

NOTE: News and information presented on this web site is for informational purposes only. ChristiansUnite.com does not necessarily endorse the views and opinions expressed.