Search Religion News

Show summaries



Religion News
Israeli News

Top News Stories
U.S. Political News
Canadian News

Christian Magazines
Link To Us

Bible Resources
• Bible Study Aids
• Bible Devotionals
• Audio Sermons
Community
• ChristiansUnite Blogs
• Christian Forums
Web Search
• Christian Family Sites
• Top Christian Sites
Family Life
• Christian Finance
• ChristiansUnite KIDS
Read
• Christian News
• Christian Columns
• Christian Song Lyrics
• Christian Mailing Lists
Connect
• Christian Singles
• Christian Classifieds
Graphics
• Free Christian Clipart
• Christian Wallpaper
Fun Stuff
• Clean Christian Jokes
• Bible Trivia Quiz
• Online Video Games
• Bible Crosswords
Webmasters
• Christian Guestbooks
• Banner Exchange
• Dynamic Content
Subscribe to our Free Newsletter.
Enter your email address:

Religion News
 You're here » News Main Index » Religion News
Religion News
Printer friendly version
Email page to a friend
Link to this story

Unions Often Ignore Religious Objectors' Right to Divert Dues, Watchdog Warns

by Jim Brown
June 27, 2006
Like This Page?

(AgapePress) - - A union watchdog group says many times powerful teachers unions like the National Education Association (NEA) stonewall religious objectors who want their membership dues diverted to a charitable organization.

The Washington Education Association recently denied a Christian teacher's request to have her dues diverted to a charity that opposes sex trafficking. The teacher objected to funding the WEA's support for abortion and same-sex "marriage" with her dues.

Justin Hakes, director of legal information for the National Right to Work Foundation (NRTW), says such cases are unfortunately all too common. "In fact," he notes, "they're so common that our organization has established a special project to provide free legal aid to employees in these sorts of situations, where they find their conscience at odds with many of the activities that union officials are engaged in politically."

That National Right to Work Foundation effort is called the "Freedom of Conscience Project," Hakes explains, and its purpose is to protect employees of faith from having their religious freedoms violated by the injustices of compulsory unionism. He says Title VII of the 1964 Federal Civil Rights Act allows employees with sincerely held religious beliefs to divert their union dues to charity.

However, Hakes notes, often when employees try to exercise this right, union officials ignore their request or create illegal hurdles before granting the worker's "religious objector" status. Also, he points out, under different Supreme Court rulings and the law, the charity to which funds are to be diverted has to be "mutually agreeable" between the union and the religious objector.

"In this case, where this woman was trying to divert her dues to a charity that battles sex trafficking and so forth," the NRTW spokesman says, "sometimes where union officials feel there may be a different agenda at work that they don't agree with, per se, at the root of the organization, and they may try to discourage employees from diverting their dues to such organizations."

Religious objectors who decide to join a liberal union are taking a gamble, Hakes asserts. He says many times union officials will throw up roadblocks to discourage workers and infringe upon this basic right; and when that happens, the Foundation's Freedom of Conscience Project stands ready to offer free legal assistance to victimized employees.


Jim Brown, a regular contributor to AgapePress, is a reporter for American Family Radio News, which can be heard online.

Discuss this article in the ChristiansUnite Discussion Forums

Back to Religion News Headlines.




More From ChristiansUnite...    About Us | Privacy Policy | | ChristiansUnite.com Site Map | Statement of Beliefs



Copyright © 1999-2025 ChristiansUnite.com. All rights reserved.
Please send your questions, comments, or bug reports to the

NOTE: News and information presented on this web site is for informational purposes only. ChristiansUnite.com does not necessarily endorse the views and opinions expressed.