Search Religion News

Show summaries



Religion News
Israeli News

Top News Stories
U.S. Political News
Canadian News

Christian Magazines
Link To Us

Bible Resources
• Bible Study Aids
• Bible Devotionals
• Audio Sermons
Community
• ChristiansUnite Blogs
• Christian Forums
Web Search
• Christian Family Sites
• Top Christian Sites
Family Life
• Christian Finance
• ChristiansUnite KIDS
Read
• Christian News
• Christian Columns
• Christian Song Lyrics
• Christian Mailing Lists
Connect
• Christian Singles
• Christian Classifieds
Graphics
• Free Christian Clipart
• Christian Wallpaper
Fun Stuff
• Clean Christian Jokes
• Bible Trivia Quiz
• Online Video Games
• Bible Crosswords
Webmasters
• Christian Guestbooks
• Banner Exchange
• Dynamic Content
Subscribe to our Free Newsletter.
Enter your email address:

Religion News
 You're here » News Main Index » Religion News
Religion News
Printer friendly version
Email page to a friend
Link to this story

Congress Hopes to Dry Up Child Porn Funds

by AFA Journal
January 10, 2007
Like This Page?

(AgapePress) - - Online child pornography will be virtually non-existent as of 2008 -- at least that's the goal of some child advocates who are working to cut off the money supply to those smut sites.

The initiative began about a year ago when Congress urged child-protection groups to work with bankers to monitor and eliminate financial transactions taking place as part of the online child-porn industry. As a result, the Financial Coalition Against Child Pornography was formed. The two groups behind formation of the Coalition are the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children (NCMEC) and its sister organization, the International Centre for Missing & Exploited Children (ICMEC).

The Coalition is made up of almost two dozen major banks and credit-card companies that are implementing a zero-tolerance policy in dealing with pornographers posing as legitimate businesses, and thus far, the initiative has been successful.

"Financial industry leaders which represent 87 percent of the U.S. payments industry -- measured in dollars running through the system -- have signed on," Ernie Allen, of Missingkids.com, recently reported on Capitol Hill.

According to Mark McCarthy, a spokesperson for Visa, this is the credit-card company's way of being proactive in the fight against child porn.

"In August of [2006], our search firm examined over 11 million Internet sites a day and found two child pornography sites that accepted Visa cards," McCarthy explained. "Of course that's two too many. Since the beginning of the year, nine such sites have been identified in the Visa system, and all of those sites were quickly expelled from our system."

Janice Crouse, senior fellow at the Beverly LaHaye Institute, told Family News In Focus that she believes the attempt to cut off money to child-porn sites is an effort that could save hundreds, even thousands, of children's lives.

Recently joining the Coalition were Chase Paymentech Solutions, Global Payments, Inc., HSBC - North America, and Washington Mutual. Other members include America Online, American Express Company, Authorize.Net, Bank of America, Capital One, Chase, Citigroup, Discover Financial Services LLC, e-gold, First Data Corporation, First National Bank of Omaha, Google, MasterCard, Microsoft, North American Bancard, Nova Information Systems, PayPal, First PREMIER Bank/PREMIER Bankcard, Standard Chartered Bank, Visa, Wells Fargo, and Yahoo! Inc.


The bulk of this article, printed with permission, appears in the January 2007 issue of AFA Journal, a monthly publication of the American Family Association.

Discuss this article in the ChristiansUnite Discussion Forums

Back to Religion News Headlines.




More From ChristiansUnite...    About Us | Privacy Policy | | ChristiansUnite.com Site Map | Statement of Beliefs



Copyright © 1999-2025 ChristiansUnite.com. All rights reserved.
Please send your questions, comments, or bug reports to the

NOTE: News and information presented on this web site is for informational purposes only. ChristiansUnite.com does not necessarily endorse the views and opinions expressed.